Opposing Views? Civil Discourse Is Still Possible.
In this video, Katie Phang shows us how opposing political views can lead to civil discourse that can be engaging, and even enlightening.
I can't judge the person Katie talks with because she's pursuing her own vision of the American dream in a way that works for her. But, it's not a way that would work for me because I am me and not her.
The conversation, though, does prove that if one is interested in learning about what motivates a loyal MAGA fan, the discourse can be both civil and eye-opening, especially if the fan is forthright and not ashamed to speak their truth—a truth that is naturally based on their personal views, ambitions, and political influences.
Slipstream
No raised voices, name calling, or nasty attitudes. I agree with you it was very interesting, but the woman makes it clear DJT is her golden goose. I couldn't do it, but she's a millionaire, and I'm not. Money talks. Always has, always will.
Wilsons Grave
This trinket seller is cashing in on Trump fever and promoting his BS in the process. I have no doubt the money she gives away goes directly into DJT's pocket for licensing rights.
Most immigrants have come here to make money and live the good life. Some will hit the jackpot like this woman. But that doesn't make her an outstanding or even good citizen. She's pledged allegiance to Donald Trump instead of the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands...
Well Street
I think it's fair to say that the majority of Americans are fed up with the divisiveness in both the government and our communities, and long for a sense of unity. Replacing harsh judgments with curiosity and a willingness to listen to those who vote and see the world differently would be a significant step toward that unity. Simple, but not easy.
Homeless Valley
I think the world's filled with a variety of people and personality types. On top of that, people have been raised with certain core values instilled since infancy. We need to stop being harsh with people who don't agree with us. What if we didn't like something else of theirs, like their china set? Should we be harsh and say, "oh you spent too much money on that...you should have given that money to the poor..."? I mean, where's the line? Let's stop trying to psychoanalyze others, too, judging and labeling them as dirty, deranged, socialist or sociopathic. We're not their therapist and hopefully we have better things to do with our time. If people choose to be okay with the government or anyone hurting people, that's on them. It's not up to me to change who they are because I don't have that power. But if they ask my opinion, I will be straight and tell them how I see things.